CNN and its war against terrorism?
This is probably the 4th consecutive day thay I open the cnn.com first page and all I see is the Al-Qaeda's training for killing, biological weapons, simple explosives, etc. I am seriously considering not ever reading CNN anymore. Why? Obviously this is a very strong propaganda for the forthcoming attack on Iraq. Even if it was not explicitly announced that Al-Qaeda's mass destruction weapons are coming from the so called "axis of evil", it would definitely be a deduction that would be made in the public's subconscious.
Now who thinks that usage of chemical weapons is that bad? After all, Iraq has already tested it quite so many times against Iranian troops during the war and at least once against its own Kurd citizens at the same time. 5000 civilian casuality is not that much if it happens in a distant Kurdish town called Halabche in Iraq, it's just the whole population of the area, what's the big deal?? It's even less interesting to know that Donald Rumsfeld was in Iraq "re-establishing?" political ties between Iraq and US around the same time that UN inspectors reported the usage of nerve gas against Iranian troops by Iraq. Hard to beleive that the first purchase that Saddam made after "re-establishment" was helicpoters that were allegedly used in the chemical attack on Halabche. Only part of the deal was first opposed by Senate, but carried out anyway.
Wanna read more boring stuff about weapons and wars? Take a look at this article.
This is probably the 4th consecutive day thay I open the cnn.com first page and all I see is the Al-Qaeda's training for killing, biological weapons, simple explosives, etc. I am seriously considering not ever reading CNN anymore. Why? Obviously this is a very strong propaganda for the forthcoming attack on Iraq. Even if it was not explicitly announced that Al-Qaeda's mass destruction weapons are coming from the so called "axis of evil", it would definitely be a deduction that would be made in the public's subconscious.
Now who thinks that usage of chemical weapons is that bad? After all, Iraq has already tested it quite so many times against Iranian troops during the war and at least once against its own Kurd citizens at the same time. 5000 civilian casuality is not that much if it happens in a distant Kurdish town called Halabche in Iraq, it's just the whole population of the area, what's the big deal?? It's even less interesting to know that Donald Rumsfeld was in Iraq "re-establishing?" political ties between Iraq and US around the same time that UN inspectors reported the usage of nerve gas against Iranian troops by Iraq. Hard to beleive that the first purchase that Saddam made after "re-establishment" was helicpoters that were allegedly used in the chemical attack on Halabche. Only part of the deal was first opposed by Senate, but carried out anyway.
Wanna read more boring stuff about weapons and wars? Take a look at this article.